Hi - ups, my posting above was in the wrong thread. It was supposed to go to the general future discussion not to the DIF collaboration.
But anyhow. “Understanding different stakeholder interests” sounds to me very “researchy” and also very “meta”. As does this:
I don’t see how to go with that.
If we go with the approach for OSCEdays that it is a growing collection of little practical things you can do (protocols) that work without understanding any theory (!) it is way more hands on.
Make it free to the people what kind of protocol they create. For example: Let’s map all “Sharing Possibilities” in our city and share it. This is a tiny practical hands on thing that is about a circular city.
This protocols (create this map) than can be reproduced everywhere. This is more practical and more useful than a big research paper. Because it is not for researchers or consultants. But for people who just “wanna have some fun and contribute to the change the world by doing this”.
Let’s look for this little change making protocols “viruses of action”. With OSCEdays in general and with DIF